Skip to content

Short answer

Cold-formed sections are roll-formed or bent from thin sheet, so they carry roof and wall loads efficiently, but thinness changes how they fail: a flat part can ripple and a lipped flange rotate at stresses below yield, a web can crumple over a support and screwed joints can tear through the sheet, so buckling and connections usually govern their design rather than yield strength alone. The answer continues below the drawing.

The reference structure

Lapped cold-formed Z purlin over three rafters, step by step: its parts, downward roof load and its path to the rafters, sagging spans and hogging over the middle rafter with web crippling at that support, wind uplift held down by the cleats, the unrestrained bottom flange in compression in the spans under uplift, with the top flange in compression over the middle rafter, local and distortional buckling of the section, lateral-torsional twisting about the screws, and eight numbered places where such members can fail Stainless bolt Sheeting Purlin Rafter Lipped Z section Gutter Lap overthe rafter Cleat Top flange Web Bottom flange Downward load Load path Sags(exaggerated) Web crippling at the support Wind uplift Cleats holdit down Bottom flangein compression Bows up(exaggerated) Localbuckling Distortionalbuckling (exaggerated) Lateral-torsional buckling: twists about the screws (exaggerated) 12345678

Close-up views

Illustrative and not to scale: no dimensions, and not a construction detail. The actual detail is designed by the project engineer.

Close-up of the lipped Z purlin in section, in a span under wind uplift: sheeting screwed to the top flange, the unrestrained bottom flange in compression (over the middle rafter the top flange is in compression instead), local buckling of the web and distortional buckling of the bottom flange and lip Sheeting Uplift Local buckling: the web ripples Bottom flange: compression Distortional: flange and lip turn at the fold

The purlin section in a span, under uplift (steps 5 and 6)

  • In the spans under uplift, the bottom flange, which the sheeting does not hold, is in compression; over the middle rafter the top flange is, as in step 5 of the overview.
  • A thin flat part such as the web can ripple in short waves (local buckling), and the compressed flange and its lip can turn together about their fold (distortional buckling). Shapes are schematic.
Close-up of lateral-torsional buckling of the purlin in section: with nothing holding the bottom flange, the section twists about the screws in its top flange Screw Twists about the screws Bottom flange pushed sideways (exaggerated)

Twisting about the screws (step 7)

  • If nothing holds the bottom flange, it pushes sideways and the section twists about the screws in its top flange.
  • Drawn as our own statics gives for this section, with the screws about two-thirds of the way out along the top flange and the sheeting holding that flange firmly sideways: their offset from the web turns it anticlockwise, more than the sideways hold of the sheeting on the Z's top flange turns it back. With the screws closer to the web than a little under half the flange width, it would turn the other way.

Key: amber arrows are loads and amber dashes the load path; straight black arrows are reactions, the forces the supports give back; grey dashes and dots are shapes, exaggerated; where marked, thick rust-red lines are in compression and thick blue lines in tension; a dot in a circle points towards you and a cross away from you; shaded amber areas mark where the step’s effect is greatest; curved arrows show a turning effect (a moment or a twist); numbered rust circles are potential failure points.

Load cases shown one at a time: downward roof load, then wind uplift as a separate case. The Z purlin is lapped over the middle rafter, so it is continuous over two spans, and rests on the end rafters; the sheeting holds its top flange sideways and nothing holds its bottom flange; a cleat is bolted to its web at each rafter. Buckled and crippled shapes are schematic and exaggerated. The twist is drawn as our own statics gives for the section shown, with the uplift acting through screws about two-thirds of the way out along the top flange and the sheeting holding that flange firmly sideways: the screws' offset from the web turns the section one way, and the sideways force the sheeting needs to hold the top flange of a Z turns it the other. For this section the screws' effect is the larger, so the section turns anticlockwise and its bottom flange swings to the right; with the screws closer to the web than a little under half the flange width, it would turn the other way. Schematic: movement is exaggerated and not to scale, and no values are calculated.

  1. The purlin run A cold-formed Z purlin spans over three rafters, lapped over the middle one so that it acts as one continuous beam. The sheeting is screwed to its top flange, and at each rafter a cleat is bolted to its web. On the right is a close-up of its lipped cross-section.
  2. Downward load Downward load case: the weight of the roof and anything on it acts on the sheeting, which passes it through its screws into the purlin. The purlin carries it as a beam to the rafters, and the cleats bolted to its web hand the reaction down.
  3. Sagging, hogging and web crippling Same case: both spans sag and the purlin hogs over the middle rafter (exaggerated); heavy lines mark the compressed flange, the top one in the spans and the bottom one over the rafter. The reaction can crumple the web there (web crippling), and the lap ends, where a single thickness carries high moment and shear, are critical too.
  4. Wind uplift, a separate case Wind uplift case: suction lifts the sheeting, and its screws pull the purlin upwards. The purlin carries the load to the rafters, where the reaction reverses: the cleat bolts now hold the purlin down.
  5. The unrestrained flange Same uplift case: the spans bow upwards (exaggerated) and the bending reverses. Now the bottom flange, which the sheeting does not hold, is in compression over most of each span, as the heavy lines show; over the middle rafter the top flange is.
  6. Local and distortional buckling Same uplift case, in the close-up (schematic shapes, exaggerated): a flat part of the thin web or flange can ripple in short waves (local buckling), and the compressed flange and its lip can rotate together about their fold with the web (distortional buckling).
  7. Lateral-torsional buckling Same uplift case: if nothing holds the bottom flange, it pushes sideways and the purlin twists about the screws in its top flange, and can roll over with the sheeting (exaggerated; this section turns this way, another section or screw position can turn the other way). Whether sag rods help depends on where they are fixed and what holds them, so follow the purlin maker's tested arrangement.
  8. Potential failure points Where such members can fail if a check or detail is missed, numbered as in the list below: the bottom flange under uplift, local buckling, distortional buckling, web crippling over the rafter, the sheeting screws, cleat bolts in thin steel, a stainless bolt in zinc-coated steel, and thin galvanized steel under a dripping gutter. Schematic, not a prediction.

Numbered places where it can fail (the final step)

  1. Purlin bottom flange in wind uplift: lateral-torsional and distortional buckling
  2. Thin web and flange: local buckling
  3. Compression flange and lip: distortional buckling
  4. Web over the internal rafter under gravity load: web crippling
  5. Sheeting screw: pull-through and pull-out
  6. Cleat bolts in thin steel: bearing and tearout
  7. Stainless bolt in zinc-coated steel: galvanic attack and galling
  8. Thin galvanized section under a dripping gutter: loss of thickness
Reference purlin run in elevation: a lapped Z purlin over three rafters under trapezoidal sheeting, with a stainless bolt at the end cleat, and a close-up of the lipped Z cross-section. Without animation the drawing shows the downward load case; the steps show wind uplift and the local, distortional and lateral-torsional buckling shapes separately. Diagram only, not to scale and with no design values.

Short answer, continued

Buckling of a thin part need not end the member's capacity: in the thin-walled compression member the JRC report describes, the section keeps carrying load after local buckling, though with a significant loss of stiffness, and yields at its corners before the member fails.1 AISC 360-16 recommends the AISI North American Specification (AISI S100) for cold-formed members other than hollow sections and lists no stainless steel among its approved materials;23 AISI S100 and AISC 370 are not held by this library, so no design rules for light-gauge or stainless members are stated here. Stainless steel resists corrosion through a thin chromium-rich passive film that re-forms on a clean surface where there is enough oxygen, but in small oxygen-starved areas such as mechanical joints, tight corners and poorly finished welds it can suffer crevice or pitting corrosion.4 Annealed austenitic stainless fasteners gall readily, and a less noble metal coupled to stainless corrodes faster as the stainless area grows relative to it.56 Choose cold-formed steel for light, repetitive secondary members and stainless for exposed or hygienic parts, and name the design standard for each in the basis of design before anything is sized.

What it is

Engineering explanation

Cold-formed steel is shaped at room temperature from thin galvanized or plain sheet, by roll-forming or press-braking, into Z and C purlins, sheeting rails and girts, sigma sections, studs, tracks and decking. In UAE buildings it is mostly secondary steel, the purlins and girts between the main frames, and light steel framing for partitions, infill walls and villa or rooftop extensions. It is typically a few millimetres thick or less, which makes it light and also makes it behave differently from hot-rolled steel.

Engineering explanation

Stainless steel is chosen for what it resists rather than for how far it spans: handrails and balustrades, cladding brackets and fixings, canopies near the sea, food and pharmaceutical plant, and exposed architectural members. Much of it is itself cold-formed.

Euro Inox (European industry guidance, not a UAE rule) gives the definition of stainless steel in EN 10088-1: a minimum chromium content of 10.5% by weight and a maximum of 1.2% carbon.4

How it carries load

Engineering explanation

Follow the roof load. Wind suction or roof load acts on the sheeting, which spans between purlins and passes the load through its screws into the purlin top flange. The purlin spans between rafters as a beam, often made continuous by lapping or sleeving it over the internal supports, and at each rafter a cleat bolted to the purlin web hands the reaction down. Girts do the same on the walls.

Engineering explanation

Sheeting that is stiff enough and properly fastened can also hold the top flange sideways. In the spans, under gravity that restrained flange is in compression; under wind uplift, which often governs light roofs, the unrestrained bottom flange is, and over the internal support of a continuous or lapped purlin the two swap. So sag rods, bracing or a liner must hold it or the purlin can roll over. Whether sag rods restrain that flange depends on the system: where they are fixed on the section and what they are anchored to decide whether they hold the bottom flange or mainly stop the purlins sagging down the roof slope, so follow the purlin maker's tested arrangement (general engineering explanation).

The JRC's Eurocode background book (European teaching guidance, not a UAE rule) describes the same system. Purlins and side rails act as secondary beams that the building envelope often restrains, and because Z and C sections can be sensitive to lateral-torsional buckling, the book says it is important to take advantage of the sheeting where it is effective. The sheeting is generally assumed to carry the load component in its own plane, while the purlin resists the component normal to it; the sheeting may also hold the purlin sideways and, where its flexural stiffness is substantial, as for trapezoidal sheeting, and it is properly connected, partly restrain its twisting. Under EN 1993-1-3, where trapezoidal sheeting is connected to the purlin and the shear stiffness it provides meets a condition set by the purlin's warping, torsional and minor-axis stiffness, its span and its height, the purlin may be regarded as laterally restrained at the connection; if the sheeting is connected to the purlin at every second rib only, that shear stiffness S is replaced by 0.20 S.78

To evaluate that restraint, EN 1993-1-3 as the book describes it treats the free flange, the one not fixed to the sheeting, as a beam on an elastic foundation; the book's figure shows a single span under uplift. A lateral spring stands for the restraint, and its stiffness combines three things: the rotational stiffness of the connection between sheet and purlin, the distortion of the purlin's cross-section, and the bending stiffness of the sheeting across the purlin's span. That is a design model of EN 1993-1-3, which this library does not hold, any more than AISI S100, so no stiffness, spring value or check is stated here; the restraint a real roof gives depends on its sheeting, its fixings and the purlin maker's tested arrangement.8

The book also shows that where the restraint acts matters (European guidance, not a UAE rule). For one simply supported Z purlin in pure bending, 202 mm deep with 75 mm flanges, 20 mm lips and 2.3 mm thick (after Martin and Purkiss, 2008), restraint at the junction of the web and the compression flange changes its buckling a great deal: holding that flange against sideways movement stops lateral-torsional buckling, and holding it against rotation raises the critical stresses of local and distortional buckling significantly. Applied at the junction of the web and the tension flange, only the rotational part of the restraint influences lateral-torsional buckling. Those curves belong to that section and loading only. EN 1993-1-3 represents the partial torsional restraint by a rotational spring that combines the stiffness of the sheet-to-purlin connection with the flexural stiffness of the sheeting, values the standard gives in its Section 10.1.5 or that can be found by test under its Annex A5; none is given here. The book notes that the same restraint model can also be used for other claddings, such as a sandwich panel on a purlin.910

Engineering explanation

Our reading for a purlin in the spans under uplift, not a statement of the book: there the flange screwed to the sheeting is the tension flange, so the sheeting's sideways hold on it does not by itself stop the free compression flange from buckling; its rotational restraint, and any bracing that reaches the free flange, are what matter, which is why the arrangement has to be the tested one.10

Engineering explanation

During erection nothing restrains either flange: until the sheeting is screwed down, a purlin is a thin beam free to twist, and a bundle of sheets landed at mid-span, or an erector walking along it, can buckle it sideways. Fixing sag rods and bracing first and landing bundles over the rafters avoids that stage failure.

Engineering explanation

Thinness changes the order of failure. For flexure, AISC classifies each plate of a steel section as compact, noncompact or slender from its width-to-thickness ratio and yield strength; for compression, as nonslender or slender.11 Most hot-rolled beams are compact, so, adequately braced, they can reach their full plastic strength before their plates buckle locally; not all are, and the AISC user note lists current rolled shapes whose flanges are not compact at 345 MPa, which need the local-buckling check.12 A cold-formed section is far thinner: a flat web or flange of the same width can ripple below yield, the lipped flange can rotate about its junction with the web, and the web can crumple under a support reaction. Cold-formed design is mostly about buckling and connections, not yield strength.

AISC 360-16 recommends the AISI North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members (AISI S100) for cold-formed members, except cold-formed hollow structural sections, which it designs itself.2 Its approved materials include sheet to ASTM A606 and A1011,3 and for the members it does design it classifies sections for local buckling by the width-to-thickness ratios of their compression elements.11 Slender-element compression members are designed on an effective area built from reduced effective widths, with the strength the lowest of flexural, torsional and flexural-torsional buckling interacting with local buckling.13

Engineering explanation

Those rules show the principle, a reduced effective width for thin plates, but they are written for hot-rolled shapes, built-up members and hollow sections; the distortional and screw rules for light-gauge open sections sit in AISI S100, which is not held.

For stainless, Euro Inox explains (European industry guidance) that corrosion resistance comes from a passive, chromium-rich oxide film that forms naturally and re-forms after scratching where there is enough oxygen, and that in small oxygen-starved areas, such as mechanical joints, tight corners and incomplete or poorly finished welds, the surface can become active and suffer crevice or pitting attack.4

Where and how it fails

Engineering explanation

1. Purlin bottom flange in wind uplift: lateral-torsional and distortional buckling. Uplift puts the unrestrained bottom flange into compression over most of the span. The flange and lip push sideways and rotate, the purlin twists about the screws in its top flange, and it can roll over and take the sheeting with it. It is a mode to check for every purlin under uplift.

For light-gauge open sections, a user note in AISC 360 recommends AISI S100 for cold-formed members other than hollow sections,2 and AISI S100 is not held, so no rule for the restraint a purlin needs under uplift is stated here.

The JRC book explains why these sections twist so readily (European guidance, not a UAE rule). They are normally thin, so their torsional stiffness is low, and many of the shapes produced by cold-forming are mono-symmetric, with the shear centre away from the centroid; a load applied off the shear centre generally twists a thin-walled beam considerably. Such beams usually need torsional restraint at intervals or continuously along their length, and Z and C purlins that are not properly braced may buckle flexural-torsionally because of their low torsional stiffness.14

Engineering explanation

2. Thin web and flange: local buckling. Each flat plate between folds buckles in short waves once its compressive stress reaches a critical value that falls quickly as the plate gets wider and thinner. The corners keep carrying load, so the member does not collapse at once, but its stiffness and capacity drop, and a locally buckled web is weaker in shear and crippling.

AISC 360 classifies a section as slender-element where any compression element exceeds its limiting width-to-thickness ratio,11 and designs slender-element compression members on a reduced effective area, the effective width of each slender element depending on its slenderness and the member’s buckling stress.13

Engineering explanation

3. Compression flange and lip: distortional buckling. The flange and its stiffening lip rotate together about the fold with the web, in a buckle longer than a local ripple but shorter than overall member buckling. A lip that is too short, bent in handling or cut for a service makes it worse.

The JRC book classes the buckling of cold-formed members as local, distortional, global (flexural, flexural-torsional or lateral-torsional) and shear buckling (European guidance, not a UAE rule). Local buckling of the individual flat plate elements has a relatively short wavelength; distortional buckling, by contrast, in which the fold lines move relative to each other, has a wavelength generally between those of local and global buckling. The two sectional modes can interact with each other and with global buckling, and for a given cross-section which mode appears depends on the buckling length. Edge or intermediate stiffeners can improve the load-carrying capacity and buckling strength of thin compression walls considerably.1514

The book illustrates this with a finite-strip analysis of one lipped channel in compression, after Hancock, plotting its buckling strength against the buckle half-wavelength (a worked illustration, not a design value). The local mode has its lowest buckling stress at a half-wavelength of 65 mm and the distortional mode at 280 mm; the distortional stress is slightly higher, so a long, fully braced length of that section is likely to buckle locally rather than distortionally. At long wavelengths it buckles flexural-torsionally, up to half-wavelengths of about 1800 mm, and flexurally beyond. Those lengths belong to that section only. Interaction between the sectional and global modes makes the member more sensitive to imperfections and erodes its theoretical buckling strength, and the book notes that, because imperfections are always present, some mode interaction always occurs in thin-walled members.1516

This library holds no rule for distortional buckling of cold-formed sections: AISC 360 recommends AISI S100 for those members,2 and AISI S100 is not held.

Engineering explanation

4. Web over the internal rafter under gravity load: web crippling. Under roof load the reaction of a continuous purlin passes into its web over a short bearing length at the rafter. A single web can fold there, the purlin drops at the support, and the moment it carried as a continuous beam is shed into the spans; under uplift the reaction reverses and the cleat bolts hold the purlin down instead. A lap or sleeve doubles the section over the support, which moves the critical point to the lap ends, where a single thickness carries a high hogging moment together with shear; a lap shortened on site moves those ends towards the support, where both are larger. Missing cleats and service holes near the support make crippling worse.

For wide-flange sections and similar built-up shapes, AISC 360 checks concentrated forces for web local yielding and web local crippling, with separate expressions for a force near the member end, and calls for stiffeners or doublers where the required strength exceeds the available strength.17 Section J10 applies to those shapes only, leaving guidance for other members to its Commentary,18 so it is not a check for a cold-formed purlin web.

The JRC book gives the reasons web crippling at concentrated loads and supports can be a critical problem for cold-formed members and sheeting (European guidance, not a UAE rule): load-bearing and end-bearing stiffeners are often impractical, which is always so for continuous sheeting and decking over several supports; their webs usually have larger depth-to-thickness ratios than hot-rolled members and are often inclined; and the load reaches the web through a bend of finite radius, so it is applied eccentrically from the web. Design codes include special provisions against it; those provisions are in AISI S100 and EN 1993-1-3, neither of which this library holds.14

Engineering explanation

5. Sheeting screw: pull-through and pull-out. Under uplift each screw is pulled upward: the sheet can tear around the screw head, the thread can strip out of a thin purlin flange, and a screw loaded sideways by thermal movement can tilt and tear its hole. Screws at roof edges and corners, where suction is highest, go first, and the sheet then peels back row by row.

AISC 360 Section J3 is written for bolts and threaded parts, with bolt strength from the nominal stress and the unthreaded body area.19 Screwed connections in thin sheet are not covered by the held documents; the screw manufacturer’s data and a cold-formed design specification would govern, and neither is held.

Engineering explanation

6. Cleat bolts in thin steel: bearing and tearout. A bolt through a thin purlin web presses on a tiny bearing area, so the hole elongates, the web tears out towards an edge, or the thin material curls round the bolt head, long before the bolt itself is at risk. Oversized or slotted holes reduce the capacity further.

For hot-rolled material AISC 360 checks bearing and tearout at each bolt hole,20 and block shear rupture along a shear path with a perpendicular tension path.21 The equivalent rules for thin sheet are in the cold-formed specification, which is not held.

Engineering explanation

7. Stainless bolt in zinc-coated steel: galvanic attack and galling. Where two metals touch in a damp or salty joint, the less noble one corrodes. A small stainless fastener in a large galvanized sheet attacks the zinc next to it, a local and slow effect; the damaging case is the reverse, a carbon steel or galvanized fixing in a large area of stainless. Separately, annealed stainless nuts and bolts can gall: the threads cold-weld during tightening and the joint seizes before it reaches its tension.

IMOA (international industry guidance, not a UAE rule) explains that the galvanic corrosion rate rises with the ratio of the noble metal’s surface area to the active metal’s, gives mild steel rivets in stainless sheet as an undesirable example, and recommends avoiding or insulating dissimilar metals, choosing metals close together in the galvanic series, or making the metal likely to corrode much larger in area, and, where a couple is unavoidable, coating the noble metal near the joint rather than the active one.6 It warns that austenitic fasteners in the annealed condition gall readily and favours fasteners that are cold worked, of higher strength or of a grade that resists galling, and it notes that the crevice in a mechanical joint can corrode in chloride media.5 Euro Inox recommends a fastener grade at least equal to the adjoining stainless in moist or humid connections.22

Engineering explanation

8. Thin galvanized section at a wet spot: loss of thickness. The zinc on thin strip is itself thin, and once it has gone a thin section loses a far larger share of its thickness to rust than a heavy member. Purlins under gutters, at sandy or salty eaves, over wet processes or against wet insulation corrode first, and since buckling and crippling depend strongly on thickness, a small loss matters.

AISC 360 requires structural components to be designed to tolerate corrosion, or to be protected against it, wherever corrosion could impair strength or serviceability.23 Part F requires the steelwork material specification to state steel grades and protective paint systems that are durable in the Dubai climate, specified to BS EN 12944 as a minimum with added requirements for ultraviolet degradation, with inspection and maintenance requirements and the expected coating life.24

Advantages and limitations

AspectAdvantageLimitation
WeightLight sections carry sheeting loads with little steelThin walls can buckle locally below yield, and webs and screwed joints can cripple or tear, so buckling and connections usually govern
ProductionRoll-formed to length and punched in the factory; light enough to fit by handSection shapes and design data are specific to each manufacturer
ContinuityLapped or sleeved purlins act as continuous beams over the supportsThe lap ends become critical, with high hogging moment and shear in a single thickness, and a lap shortened on site weakens them
Durability, cold-formedPre-galvanized strip arrives protectedThe coating is thin; cut edges, holes and handling damage need attention
Durability, stainlessA self-repairing passive film and no paint to maintain in a suitable exposureCrevices, heat tint, iron contamination or the wrong grade still lead to pitting
ConnectionsScrews and small bolts are quick and need no hot workPull-through, bearing and galling govern, and mixed metals corrode
Design basisAISC 360 designs cold-formed hollow sections itselfAISI S100 and AISC 370 are not held here, and the Dubai Building Code lists no light-gauge or stainless grades
CostIn our judgement cold-formed secondary steel can use less steel than hot-rolled for the same dutyStainless costs much more than carbon steel for the same duty and needs segregated fabrication
Cold-formed and stainless steel compared with hot-rolled carbon steel (our assessment)

Engineering judgement for comparison, not a code rule. The passive film and crevice points are from Euro Inox guidance,4 and the design-basis points from AISC 360 and Part F.225

Why this structure, and not another

Engineering explanation

Our explanation. Cold-formed against hot-rolled purlins: for normal spans between portal frames, lapped cold-formed Z or C purlins are, in our judgement, a natural first choice: light, made to length and easy to fix sheeting to. Hot-rolled channels or small I-sections win where purlins carry heavy services or hoists, span beyond the manufacturer’s range, act as struts in the roof bracing, or would lose most of a thin wall to corrosion.

Engineering explanation

Light steel framing against hot-rolled steel or masonry: studs and tracks build partitions, infill walls and light floors quickly and dry, which suits rooftop and villa extensions where every kilogram on the existing structure matters. They depend on sheathing, bracing and screws for stability and tolerate little cutting of openings after the fact.

Engineering explanation

Stainless against galvanized or painted carbon steel: stainless is chosen where a coating could not be maintained, where appearance must last, where hygiene matters or where exposure is aggressive. Galvanized carbon steel costs less for the same duty and, in our judgement, is adequate for most structural members in normal exposure.

Euro Inox (European industry guidance, not a UAE rule) describes austenitic grade 1.4401 (316), with its molybdenum, as appropriate for coastal or heavy industrial exposed sites and grade 1.4301 (304) for less demanding exterior environments, ferritic grades as better suited to internal or cosmetic uses, and duplex grades as increasingly specified for structural members.22

Engineering explanation

Stainless against aluminium: aluminium is lighter and needs no coating in many exposures, but it is less stiff, the Code sends its structural design to the International Building Code rather than its steel section,26 and mixing it with stainless or carbon steel brings the galvanic question back.

For the experienced engineer

Hollow sections are the cold-formed members AISC 360 does design.2 For hollow sections made to approved standards other than ASTM A1065 and A1085, which includes A500,3 the design wall thickness is 0.93 times the nominal thickness.27

Source and applicability: Dubai Building Code 2021, Tables F.5 and F.6 (A001 PDF page 356). The Code's tabulated yield values for cold-formed hollow sections are not stated in this release, because the reading the Authority applies to them has not been confirmed.

Engineering explanation

Our reading of the 6 mm clause: it is written for plate girders and built-up columns and does not make a 2 mm lipped channel or back-to-back stud a compliant built-up section; it is one more sign that light-gauge members need their own named standard. The Code’s tabulated yield values for cold-formed hollow sections are not used here until the reading the Authority applies is confirmed; take the value from the project’s approved material basis.

Welding thin and stainless steel: AWS D1.1:2020 was developed for carbon and low-alloy steels 3 mm or thicker with a specified minimum yield strength of 690 MPa or less, with the Engineer to judge its suitability outside that range, and its committee points to AWS D1.3 for sheet steel up to 5 mm thick and AWS D1.6 for stainless steel;28 neither is held.

Forming stainless: Euro Inox (European industry guidance, not a UAE rule) notes that austenitic grades work harden, so bending them takes about 50% more power than carbon steel of similar thickness and parts must be overbent by about 5° to allow for springback, that drills should be sharp and run at the right speed and feed to avoid bluing or work hardening, and that tools used on stainless should be kept for stainless only.22

Heat tint and contamination (industry guidance, not UAE rules): Euro Inox explains that welding heat tint leaves a surface layer with less chromium than the bulk steel, so visible heat tint reduces the corrosion resistance of the surface, and removing all of it is good practice.29 IMOA advises keeping carbon steel away during fabrication and handling, with dedicated tools and clean abrasives, and says steel shot must not be used on stainless steel, because embedded iron particles rust on the surface;30 its table links cold forming and machining to stress corrosion cracking and mechanical joining to crevice and galvanic corrosion, the actual effect depending on many factors.6

Thermal movement: for steel members and members exposed to solar radiation, Part F takes a range equal to the maximum temperature swing as appropriate, allows a ±25 °C default only for protected steel, and leaves the Engineer to assess the thermally induced forces case by case.31

IMOA (international industry guidance) tabulates mean expansion coefficients from 20 to 100 °C of 16.4 × 10⁻⁶ per K for Type 304, 13.0 for duplex 2205 and 12.1 for carbon steel.32

Engineering explanation

So austenitic stainless moves noticeably more than carbon steel, while duplex is close to it, and a long austenitic rail or cladding support fixed rigidly to a carbon steel frame builds force at its fixings.

Engineering explanation

Known pitfalls: missing sag rods, or rods placed differently from the purlin maker's tested arrangement; a service hole beside a support; a lap shortened on site, which moves the lap end towards the higher moment near the support; sheet bundles landed at mid-span of unsheeted purlins; cheaper sheeting screws; stainless bolts with no anti-galling measure; carbon steel ground next to stainless; and one manufacturer’s purlin tables used with another’s sections.

Which rules apply in Dubai

Part F designs structural steel to AISC 360 and the standards it references, with ASTM materials, AWS welding and the steel grades that Tables F.5 and F.6 say shall be adopted, from American or British specifications, the Engineer keeping the material specification compatible with the design basis, including detailing and ductility.33 Other materials, such as aluminium, timber, gypsum board, glass and plastic, follow Chapters 23 to 26 of the IBC and may be used only where Sections 2, 4, 6 and 7 of Chapter 1 of the UAE Fire and Life Safety Code also permit them, and every material must be specified compatibly with the codes and designed for changes in its strength, stiffness and durability over time.26 Codes are stated by number, title and edition, and where Part F and a referenced standard conflict, the most restrictive requirement is met.34

Engineering explanation

Our reading: stainless steel and light-gauge open sections appear neither in the grade tables nor in the list of other materials, so the Code gives them no design route. The basis of design has to name the design standard, grade and design strength for each; the Code allows alternative standards only where the Authority permits them and the standard meets the Code’s intent, so that acceptance is needed before design goes ahead.35 What would govern is a cold-formed member design specification (AISC 360 recommends AISI S100), a structural stainless steel design specification and the manufacturer’s tested section data; AISI S100 and AISC 370 are not held, and no rule from either is stated in this library.

Engineering explanation

Detailed guides in this library: Architectural and secondary steelwork in Dubai: coatings, fixings and movement and Steel portal frame: how it carries load, where it fails, and when to choose it, for where purlins and girts sit.

Engineering explanation

Gaps: AISI S100, AISC 370, AWS D1.3, AWS D1.6, the International Building Code and the purlin, stud and screw manufacturers’ design data are not held. The SSAB guide on bending high-strength steel in the library’s register is not held as a PDF.

What to settle before design

Settle these before cold-formed or stainless members are sized

  • Design standard and edition for every cold-formed and stainless member, accepted before design
  • Section manufacturer and its tested section data, fixed before the purlin layout
  • Wind uplift at roof edges and corners, and how the purlin bottom flange is restrained
  • Lap or sleeve length and cleat detail at every support, not shortened on site
  • Erection: sag rods and bracing fixed before sheet bundles are landed, and bundles landed over rafters
  • Screw type, size and spacing from the screw maker’s data for the sheet and purlin thickness
  • Service holes in webs: positions and sizes agreed before production
  • Exposure and coating of galvanized members, including gutters and wet areas
  • Stainless grade for the exposure, fastener grade and anti-galling measure
  • Isolation wherever stainless meets zinc-coated steel, carbon steel or aluminium
  • Welding standard for sheet and for stainless, and how heat tint is removed

A working list for a junior engineer. It is not an approval checklist.

Scope and limits

Practical consideration

Written from the 2021 Dubai Building Code, ANSI/AISC 360-16, AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2020 and the Euro Inox and IMOA stainless guides (industry guidance, not UAE rules), as held on the check date; later amendments were not audited. AISI S100, AISC 370, AWS D1.3, AWS D1.6, the International Building Code and purlin, stud and screw manufacturers’ data are not held, so no design strength, effective width, distortional buckling, web crippling, screw or bearing value is stated for light-gauge or stainless members. The explanations are ours; this is not a design.

Questions this guide answers

Source notes

Numbered notes point to the exact section and physical PDF page. Page numbers are the PDF viewer’s page, which can differ from the number printed on the page. Sources checked 26 September 2026. These notes support the statements; they are not a substitute for reading the current document for a project.

  1. Eurocodes: Background & Applications - Design of Steel Buildings, Worked Examples, 2015, EUR 27346 EN / JRC96658. European Commission Joint Research Centre / Publications Office of the European Union. JRC report EUR 27346, Chapter 4 Cold-formed steel design essentials (D. Dubina), 4.2.2.1, Figure 4.8 and the behaviour of a thin-walled compression bar (printed page 196), PDF page 212. Open the publisher PDF at page 212 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  2. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section A1, User Note on cold-formed steel structural members, printed page 16.1-2. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩

  3. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section A3.1a ASTM designations, items (a) to (e), printed page 16.1-7. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  4. Pickling and Passivating Stainless Steel, Second edition 2007; verified PDF p. 3. Euro Inox; hosted by worldstainless. Euro Inox, Pickling and Passivating Stainless Steel, 1 Introduction: the passive layer (printed page 2), PDF page 4. Open the publisher PDF at page 4 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩

  5. Practical Guidelines for the Fabrication of Austenitic Stainless Steels, Second edition 2020; verified PDF p. 2. International Molybdenum Association / International Chromium Development Association / Nickel Institute. IMOA, Fabrication of Austenitic Stainless Steels, 13 Mechanical joining methods, 13.1.1 Bolting and screwing (printed page 68), PDF page 68. Open the publisher PDF at page 68 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  6. Practical Guidelines for the Fabrication of Austenitic Stainless Steels, Second edition 2020; verified PDF p. 2. International Molybdenum Association / International Chromium Development Association / Nickel Institute. IMOA, Practical Guidelines for the Fabrication of Austenitic Stainless Steels, 6.4 Galvanic corrosion continued, 6.5 and Table 7 (printed page 31), PDF page 31. Open the publisher PDF at page 31 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  7. Eurocodes: Background & Applications - Design of Steel Buildings, Worked Examples, 2015, EUR 27346 EN / JRC96658. European Commission Joint Research Centre / Publications Office of the European Union. JRC report EUR 27346, Chapter 4 (D. Dubina), 4.4.5 Beams restrained by sheeting, 4.4.5.1 General approach and Eq. (4.66) (printed page 264), PDF page 280. Open the publisher PDF at page 280 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  8. Eurocodes: Background & Applications - Design of Steel Buildings, Worked Examples, 2015, EUR 27346 EN / JRC96658. European Commission Joint Research Centre / Publications Office of the European Union. JRC report EUR 27346, Chapter 4 (D. Dubina), 4.4.5.1 continued: symbols of Eq. (4.66), the 0.20 S rule and the free-flange model, Figures 4.49 to 4.52 (printed page 265), PDF page 281. Open the publisher PDF at page 281 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  9. Eurocodes: Background & Applications - Design of Steel Buildings, Worked Examples, 2015, EUR 27346 EN / JRC96658. European Commission Joint Research Centre / Publications Office of the European Union. JRC report EUR 27346, Chapter 4 (D. Dubina), 4.4.5.1 continued: partial torsional restraint, Eq. (4.67), Figures 4.53 to 4.55 (printed page 266), PDF page 282. Open the publisher PDF at page 282 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  10. Eurocodes: Background & Applications - Design of Steel Buildings, Worked Examples, 2015, EUR 27346 EN / JRC96658. European Commission Joint Research Centre / Publications Office of the European Union. JRC report EUR 27346, Chapter 4 (D. Dubina), 4.4.5.1 continued: Figures 4.55 and 4.56, restraint at the compression or tension flange, after Martin and Purkiss 2008 (printed page 267), PDF page 283. Open the publisher PDF at page 283 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  11. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section B4.1 Classification of sections for local buckling, printed page 16.1-16. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  12. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section F2, User Note on rolled shapes whose flanges are not compact, printed page 16.1-47. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  13. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section E7 Members with slender elements, Eq. E7-1 to E7-3, printed page 16.1-42. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  14. Eurocodes: Background & Applications - Design of Steel Buildings, Worked Examples, 2015, EUR 27346 EN / JRC96658. European Commission Joint Research Centre / Publications Office of the European Union. JRC report EUR 27346, Chapter 4 (D. Dubina), 4.2.2.1 closing paragraph on stiffeners, 4.2.2.2 Web crippling and 4.2.2.3 Torsional rigidity (printed page 197), PDF page 213. Open the publisher PDF at page 213 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  15. Eurocodes: Background & Applications - Design of Steel Buildings, Worked Examples, 2015, EUR 27346 EN / JRC96658. European Commission Joint Research Centre / Publications Office of the European Union. JRC report EUR 27346, Chapter 4 (D. Dubina), 4.2.2.1 Buckling strength of cold-formed steel members, Figure 4.6 (printed page 194), PDF page 210. Open the publisher PDF at page 210 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  16. Eurocodes: Background & Applications - Design of Steel Buildings, Worked Examples, 2015, EUR 27346 EN / JRC96658. European Commission Joint Research Centre / Publications Office of the European Union. JRC report EUR 27346, Chapter 4 (D. Dubina), 4.2.2.1, Figure 4.7 buckling strength versus half-wavelength for a lipped channel in compression, after Hancock 2001 (printed page 195), PDF page 211. Open the publisher PDF at page 211 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  17. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Sections J10.2 Web local yielding and J10.3 Web local crippling, printed page 16.1-143. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  18. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section J10 Flanges and webs with concentrated forces, introduction and User Notes, printed page 16.1-142. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  19. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section J3.6 Tensile and shear strength of bolts and threaded parts, printed page 16.1-131. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  20. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section J3.10 Bearing and tearout strength at bolt holes, printed page 16.1-135. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  21. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section J4.3 Block shear strength, printed page 16.1-138. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  22. Guide to Stainless Steel Finishes, Third edition 2005, Building Series Vol. 1; verified PDF p. 3. Euro Inox; hosted by worldstainless. Euro Inox, Guide to Stainless Steel Finishes, Annex A: selection of material grade, workability and mechanical connections (printed page 18), PDF page 20. Open the publisher PDF at page 20 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  23. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section B3.13 Design for corrosion effects, printed page 16.1-15. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  24. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.5.6.3 Durability, steelwork structures (printed page F16), PDF page 342. Open the publisher PDF at page 342 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  25. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, Table F.5 and Table F.6 Steel grades, and F.6.5.3 Plate thickness (printed page F30), PDF page 356. Open the publisher PDF at page 356 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  26. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.6.1 Materials, general (printed page F17), PDF page 343. Open the publisher PDF at page 343 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  27. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16 Section B4.2 Design wall thickness for HSS, printed page 16.1-20. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  28. Structural Welding Code - Steel (AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2020), AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2020, 24th edition. American Welding Society (AWS). AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2020 Clause 1, 1.4 Limitations (printed page 2). Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  29. Pickling and Passivating Stainless Steel, Second edition 2007; verified PDF p. 3. Euro Inox; hosted by worldstainless. Euro Inox, Pickling and Passivating Stainless Steel, 5 Welding heat tint (printed page 8), PDF page 10. Open the publisher PDF at page 10 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  30. Practical Guidelines for the Fabrication of Austenitic Stainless Steels, Second edition 2020; verified PDF p. 2. International Molybdenum Association / International Chromium Development Association / Nickel Institute. IMOA, Fabrication of Austenitic Stainless Steels, 7.3 Avoiding iron contamination (printed page 34), PDF page 34. Open the publisher PDF at page 34 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  31. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.11 Thermally induced forces (printed page F35), PDF page 361. Open the publisher PDF at page 361 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  32. Practical Guidelines for the Fabrication of Duplex Stainless Steels, Third edition 2014; verified PDF p. 2. International Molybdenum Association. IMOA, Practical Guidelines for the Fabrication of Duplex Stainless Steels, Table 9, coefficient of thermal expansion rows (printed page 30), PDF page 30. Open the publisher PDF at page 30 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  33. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.6.5.1 Design basis and F.6.5.2 Steel grades, right-hand column (printed page F29), PDF page 355. Open the publisher PDF at page 355 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  34. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.4.1 Application (printed page F11), PDF page 337. Open the publisher PDF at page 337 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  35. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part A, A.8 Alternative solutions, alternative standards where permitted by the Authority (printed page A16), PDF page 18. Open the publisher PDF at page 18 (opens in a new tab) ↩