Skip to content

The question

What serviceability limits apply to a steel structure in Dubai, and where do the numbers come from?

Short answer

The Dubai Building Code does not set its own span ratios for steel members: steel deflection limits follow AISC 360 and AISC Design Guide 3; a cantilever’s span may be taken as twice its length, and the limits do not account for precamber, which may be used to offset total deflection.1 AISC 360 itself sets no numbers either; it requires limits chosen for the structure’s function and evaluated with serviceability load combinations.2 The Code does set numbers for wind: overall building displacement of H/500 and inter-storey drift between Hs/400 and Hs/600, both under 10-year wind pressures,3 and structural damping of 0.75% to 1% of critical for steel structures in serviceability checks.4 The natural frequency of steel floors for normal occupancy is evaluated to AISC Design Guide 11 or SCI P354,5 and members supporting vibrating machinery, vehicles or plant should be checked for fatigue; where fatigue is critical, the steel design shall be checked to AISC 360 Appendix 3.6

What serviceability covers

Part F’s basis of design includes, as a minimum, deflection control in steel structures, building movement and motion due to wind, movement due to earthquake, movement joints and building separation, vibration, lateral acceleration, fatigue and additional requirements for transfer elements, alongside strength.7

AISC 360 treats serviceability as preserving a building’s function, appearance, maintainability, durability and occupant comfort in normal use. Its limiting values, such as maximum deflections and accelerations, are to be chosen for the intended function of the structure and checked with the applicable load combinations; a user note points to Appendix C of ASCE/SEI 7 for serviceability loads and combinations, and says the reduced stiffnesses of the direct analysis method are not meant for these checks.2

Practical consideration

Run serviceability checks with service-level loads and the full member stiffness, not with the strength load combinations or the reduced stiffness used for stability design. Service loads are defined for serviceability (the AISC user note points to ASCE/SEI 7 Appendix C, not held here), and for wind drift the Code specifies 10-year return pressures. Many analysis programs need a separate set of serviceability combinations for this.

Deflection of steel members

Deflection limits are adopted so that the building keeps working as intended, and may be governed by furniture, finishes, fixtures and fittings. Vertical and horizontal deflections stay within the limits of the referenced design standards and any project-specific requirements, for example from cladding, crane girders or members supporting sensitive machinery. The most adverse realistic combination and arrangement of serviceability loads is used, and the Engineer verifies that the adopted limits keep the building functional.8

For steel, the limits follow AISC 360 and AISC Design Guide 3. A cantilever may be treated as a span of twice its length, and the limits do not take account of precamber, which may be used to reduce the effect of total deflection.1 AISC 360 requires deflections of members and systems, and drift, to be limited so they do not impair serviceability, without giving numbers.2

For comparison, the Code does put a number on concrete: the incremental deflection of concrete slabs and beams after partitions and finishes are installed is limited to 20 mm.9 It states no equivalent figure for steelwork.

Practical consideration

Because neither the Code nor AISC 360 gives a deflection limit or span ratio for steel beams or other steel members, the held documents give no maximum ratio to quote: the limits have to be chosen for the project and written into the basis of design, from AISC Design Guide 3 (not held here) and from the cladding, glazing, partition and equipment suppliers’ tolerances. As an illustration of the cantilever rule, not a limit, a 2.0 m canopy cantilever may be checked as a 4.0 m span, so whatever span ratio the project adopts allows it twice the deflection of a 2.0 m simple span (our arithmetic). Crane runway girders are a project-specific case under F.8.3.1:8 their vertical and lateral limits come from the crane supplier or the project specification, and this library does not state them.

Wind drift and building motion

Overall building displacement is calculated with 10-year return wind pressures and the total building height H, and inter-storey movement with 10-year pressures and the floor-to-floor height Hs; the clause, as printed, calls the second an inter-storey shear calculation. Table F.11 limits overall displacement to H/500 and inter-storey drift to between Hs/400 and Hs/600. The overall limit is there to protect cladding, partitions and other non-structural components from overstress, fatigue damage or loss of effectiveness, and inter-storey displacement may be estimated from inter-storey drift or calculated to include other deformations.3 Buildings taller than 120 m or more than five times as tall as they are wide are wind tunnel tested; see the wind guide.3

Accelerations of the uppermost occupied floor are assessed for 1-year and 10-year return periods and compared with recognised criteria, such as ISO 10137 or the ASCE guide on wind-induced motion of tall buildings; the Code shows the ISO 10137 horizontal-acceleration curves for offices and residences as Figure F.17, which is not reproduced here.10 Unless the design adds damping, the damping estimates of Table F.12 for normal buildings are used for both serviceability and strength: for steel structures, 0.75% to 1% of critical for serviceability and 1% to 1.5% for strength design, with intermediate values for composite steel and concrete.4

StepValueBasis
FrameFour storeys at 4.0 m, total height H = 16.0 mAssumed building
Wind pressures10-year return (MRI) pressures for both checksF.7.12.4.1
Overall displacement limit16 000/500 = 32 mm at roof levelH/500
Inter-storey drift limit4000/400 = 10.0 mm to 4000/600 = 6.7 mm per storeyHs/400 to Hs/600
Which end of the rangeChosen for the cladding and partitions; record it in the basis of designTable F.11 gives a range
How the two limits interactFour storeys at 10.0 mm each would total 40 mm, above 32 mm; with equal drift in every storey, the overall limit governs unless each storey stays at or below 8.0 mm (Hs/500)Our arithmetic
Damping for motion checks0.75% to 1% of critical (steel, serviceability)Table F.12
Worked example: wind drift limits for a four-storey steel frame (our calculation)

Limits from Table F.11 and damping from Table F.12;34 the frame is our assumption: all four storeys, including the ground storey, 4.0 m high; H measured from the base; drift taken at the building’s extremities, including torsion, not only at the centre of mass; the 10-year wind applied without load factors and with full stiffness. The Code does not say which end of the inter-storey range applies to which case, so the choice is a design decision to agree with the reviewer. The table shows limits, not a drift check of any frame. Illustration only.

Practical consideration

For a single-storey shed or portal frame, H equals Hs, so H/500 falls inside the inter-storey range. Whether Table F.11 is applied to such structures, and at which limit, is a design-basis decision to agree with the Authority; the cladding and door suppliers’ movement tolerances also have to be met.

Floor vibration

The natural frequency of steel floor systems for normal occupancy is evaluated to AISC Design Guide 11 or SCI P354.5 AISC 360 requires the effect of vibration on occupant comfort and on the function of the structure to be considered, including occupant loading and vibrating machinery, and likewise the effect of wind-induced motion on occupants.11

Practical consideration

Long-span steel floors, mezzanines and footbridges attached to buildings are where vibration most often governs. AISC Design Guide 11 is not held by this library. SCI P354 is held, and the guide Floor and stair vibration of steel structures in Dubai: the SCI P354 method the Code names explains its method and acceptance criteria.

Movement joints, thermal movement and connection slip

Movement joints are provided where necessary for expansion or deflection of above-ground structures, and the separation from any surrounding obstruction is at least the total maximum displacement defined in Section 12.12 of ASCE/SEI 7-16. Because movement joints are a common source of water ingress, structures below ground should be designed without them.12 The separation is found from the Code’s Eq. F.7 and F.8: the total is the square root of the sum of the squares of the two adjacent structures’ maximum inelastic displacements at their facing edges, and each inelastic displacement is the elastic analysis displacement multiplied by the deflection amplification factor Cd and divided by the importance factor Ie, both from ASCE/SEI 7-16.12 Using the elastic analysis output directly understates the separation.

Drift and deformation are assessed over the whole life of the structure, including construction stages. Out-of-plumb under permanent gravity loads is verified by the Engineer and the Contractor against Section 7 of ACI 117-10, with any setting-out correction specified by the Engineer. For multi-storey buildings with different stresses in cores and perimeter columns, asymmetric plans or massing, stepped setbacks or outriggers, the Code requires, as a minimum, a non-linear construction-sequence analysis of differential vertical shortening, with the method agreed with the Authority and site corrections submitted for review and approval. Seismic drift and deformation follow Section 12.12 of ASCE/SEI 7-16, and wind drift follows F.7.12.4.13

AISC 360 requires the effects of thermal expansion and contraction of a building to be considered, and the effects of slip in bolted connections to be included where slip could impair serviceability, with slip-critical design where appropriate.11 In Dubai, F.7.11 allows a default range of ±25 °C only for protected steel; exposed steel is assessed case by case.14

Fatigue

Members supporting vibrating machinery, vehicles or plant should be checked for fatigue. Stress changes from normal wind fluctuations need not be included, but wind-induced oscillation is allowed for where aerodynamic instability can occur. Where fatigue is critical, steel is checked to Appendix 3 of AISC 360, and all details are fully defined, including workmanship and quality assurance tests.6

AISC 360 requires fatigue to be considered for members and connections under repeated loading, but not for seismic effects or for wind on typical building lateral systems and enclosures; it also requires components to tolerate corrosion, or be protected, where corrosion could impair strength or serviceability.15 Under Appendix 3, the fatigue resistance of shapes and plate is determined when live load is applied more than 20,000 times; hollow sections in building-type structures under code wind loads need no fatigue evaluation; the peak stress from cyclic loads is limited to 0.66Fy; and the method applies only to steel with suitable corrosion protection, or in mildly corrosive conditions, at temperatures not above 150 °C. No further evaluation is needed where the applied stress range is below the threshold stress range of Table A-3.1; under stress reversal the range is the numerical sum of the maximum repeated tensile and compressive stresses, or of the maximum shearing stresses of opposite direction; and the engineer of record either gives complete details, including weld sizes, or specifies the planned cycle life and the maximum ranges of moment, shear and reaction for the connections.16

Practical consideration

Crane runway girders and their brackets are the usual fatigue case in Dubai industrial buildings. Count the stress cycles over the design life early, including every wheel pass and trolley movement, not only the number of lifts: at more than 20,000 live-load cycles the girder, its welds and its connections need the Appendix 3 check, which can change weld details and inspection requirements. On coastal or industrial sites, the Appendix 3 resistances also depend on the steel being suitably protected against corrosion.

Transfer beams and trusses

Any beam, slab or truss that redirects the gravity or lateral load path of upper storeys onto different vertical structure below is a transfer element, and the Code says transfer structures should be avoided where possible. Where they are used: transfer beams have at least two direct supports; the column axis may not be eccentric to the beam axis; the load taken is not less than a tributary-area hand calculation; elements supporting planted columns whose failure could cause progressive collapse are treated as key elements; the planted structure has alternative load paths; the transfer structure resists the maximum reactions attached components can reasonably transmit; members not otherwise covered are analysed for the possible critical combinations; and members supported by the transfer element meet the F.8.3 deflection limits. The Code also asks for the long-term deflection of transfer members and their supports to be considered.17

Ponding on roofs

A roof system must be analysed for strength and stability under ponding unless the roof surface is configured to prevent water accumulating, with methods in Appendix 2 of AISC 360.15

Practical consideration

Only a roof surface configured to prevent water accumulating is exempt. A low-slope steel roof with parapets can still pond if outlets block, so give it enough fall and overflow capacity to prevent accumulation, or carry out the ponding check.

Serviceability items to state in the basis of design

  • Deflection limits chosen for each member type, and their source
  • Cantilever span basis stated (the Code permits twice the cantilever length) and any precamber credit explained
  • Serviceability load combinations set up separately from strength combinations
  • Wind drift under 10-year pressures against H/500 and the chosen Hs/400 to Hs/600 limit
  • Damping assumed for motion checks
  • Floor vibration method (AISC Design Guide 11 or SCI P354) and acceptance criteria
  • Movement joints, and separation to neighbouring structures from amplified inelastic displacements (Eq. F.7 and F.8)
  • Fatigue: cycle count for cranes, machinery and vehicles
  • Transfer elements identified and treated as such

A working list for a junior engineer. It is not an approval checklist.

Scope and limits

Practical consideration

Values are from the 2021 edition of the Dubai Building Code as read on the check date, and from ANSI/AISC 360-16; later amendments and editions were not audited. AISC Design Guides 3 and 11, ASCE/SEI 7-16 and ISO 10137 are named but not held by this library, so their limits are not stated; SCI P354 is held and summarised in the mezzanine guide. The worked example is our arithmetic, not a check of any building.

Questions this guide answers

Source notes

Numbered notes point to the exact section and physical PDF page. Page numbers are the PDF viewer’s page, which can differ from the number printed on the page. Sources checked 25 September 2026. These notes support the statements; they are not a substitute for reading the current document for a project.

  1. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.3.3 Steelwork deflection limits (printed page F45), PDF page 371. Open the publisher PDF at page 371 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  2. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Chapter L, L1 General provisions, L2 Deflections, L3 Drift, printed page 16.1-165. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  3. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.12.3.1 Requirements for testing, F.7.12.4.1 Allowable displacement and Table F.11 (printed page F38), PDF page 364. Open the publisher PDF at page 364 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩

  4. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.12.5 Structural damping and Table F.12 (printed page F39), PDF page 365. Open the publisher PDF at page 365 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  5. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.8.1 Vibration, steelwork (printed page F47), PDF page 373. Open the publisher PDF at page 373 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  6. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.9 Fatigue (printed page F48), PDF page 374. Open the publisher PDF at page 374 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  7. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.1 Design basis (printed page F44), PDF page 370. Open the publisher PDF at page 370 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  8. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.3.1 Deflection control, general (printed page F44), PDF page 370. Open the publisher PDF at page 370 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  9. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.3.2 Concrete beam and slab deflection (printed page F44), PDF page 370. Open the publisher PDF at page 370 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  10. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.12.4.2 Motions affecting occupant comfort (printed page F39), PDF page 365. Open the publisher PDF at page 365 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  11. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Chapter L, L4 Vibration to L7 Connection slip, printed page 16.1-166. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  12. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.7 Movement joints and building separation (printed page F47), PDF page 373. Open the publisher PDF at page 373 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  13. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.6 Drift and deformation of buildings, F.8.6.1 to F.8.6.5 (printed page F46), PDF page 372. Open the publisher PDF at page 372 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  14. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.11 Thermally induced forces (printed page F35), PDF page 361. Open the publisher PDF at page 361 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  15. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Sections B3.10 Design for ponding, B3.11 Design for fatigue and B3.13 Design for corrosion effects, printed page 16.1-15. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  16. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 3, Section 3.1 General provisions (fatigue), printed page 16.1-196. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  17. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.10 Transfer elements (printed page F48), PDF page 374. Open the publisher PDF at page 374 (opens in a new tab) ↩