Skip to content

The question

What governs the design of a steel portal-frame warehouse in Dubai?

Short answer

A steel portal-frame warehouse or factory is a use the Dubai Building Code covers, while the storage racks and cranes inside it are not DBC structures.12 Its steel is designed to AISC 360, with AISC 341 for seismic design, and its loads come from ASCE/SEI 7-16 together with Part F, including the Dubai reference wind speeds and minimum design wind pressure.345 AISC 360 requires stability of the frame as a whole and of every member, with second-order effects and imperfections in the analysis, and any purlin, rail or stay relied on to shorten a buckling length has to have the strength and stiffness of a brace.67 The Code requires every member that restrains a critical compression member to be identified and designed, built-up plate to be at least 6 mm thick, steel deflection limits to AISC 360 and AISC Design Guide 3 that suit the cladding, and the thermal range of steelwork to be assessed.89101112 In Dubai Municipality areas, the permit, structural inspections and completion follow the Municipality’s industrial buildings procedure through Dubai BPS.13

Is a portal-frame warehouse within the Dubai Building Code?

The Code applies to new buildings and to changes to existing buildings as set out in Table A.1, except where an alternative solution is permitted, and Table A.2 lists the occupancies it covers: storage use is described as warehouse, and industrial use as factory and workshop.1 Part F applies to the design and construction of buildings and of structures or appurtenances connected to a building.14

The Code does not apply to structures such as tents, cranes, storage racks, scaffolding, formwork and falsework, nor to structures with specific loading conditions such as silos and chimneys.2

Practical consideration

So the shed is a DBC building, but the pallet racking and any overhead crane inside it are not DBC structures. Their effects on the building still have to be designed for: the Code requires concentrated live loads to be evaluated for objects creating significant point loads, including machinery, vehicles and storage racks,15 and the crane runway guide in this library (Crane runways in Dubai steel buildings) covers what the frame owes a crane.

Separately, structural elements have to be designed for the accidental impact loading conditions specified in Section 4.6 of ASCE/SEI 7-16, and the Code recommends a secondary protection system for every primary structural member to guard it against accidental impact.16 The clause is not limited to any type of building or vehicle. ASCE/SEI 7-16 is not held by this library, so what its Section 4.6 covers is not stated here.

Practical consideration

In a warehouse where forklifts or trucks run, the secondary protection usually means column guards or bollards at every column in a traffic zone, shown on the drawings (our reading).

The design basis, and where the other guides take over

Structural steel is designed to AISC 360 and the codes and standards it references, with seismic design to AISC 341, materials to ASTM standards and welding to AWS standards.3 Loads are defined by ASCE/SEI 7-16 together with section F.7 of the Code, and factored and combined to Chapter 2 of ASCE/SEI 7-16.4

Practical consideration

This guide does not repeat what other guides in this library already set out; read them alongside it. Minimum design loads for steel structures in Dubai covers dead, superimposed dead, live, construction and thermal loads. The wind-load design basis for steel structures in Dubai covers the reference wind speeds and the minimum design pressure. Serviceability of steel structures in Dubai covers deflection, drift and ponding. Load paths, stability and bracing of steel structures in Dubai sets out the direct analysis method, the alternative methods and Appendix 6 in full.

  1. ScopeWarehouse or factory under Part F; racks, cranes and forklifts treated as loads and impacts on the building.
  2. BasisCodes and editions, design life, risk category, site class and deflection limits written down.
  3. LoadsDead, services, roof live load, wind with uplift, seismic, thermal, racking and crane loads.
  4. Frame analysisSecond-order analysis in the plane of the frames, by the stability method chosen.
  5. Members and restraintRafters and columns checked between braced points; purlins, rails and stays designed as braces.
  6. Bracing and basesRoof and wall bracing, eaves struts, base plates, anchor rods and foundations for uplift and shear.
  7. ServiceabilitySway, rafter deflection, gable differential movement, doors, cladding and thermal movement.
  8. PermitDrawings and documents through Dubai BPS; structural inspections and completion.
A practical order of work for a portal-frame warehouse. It is not a code procedure.

Wind and uplift on light roofs

The Engineer calculates wind effects taking into account strength, for life safety, and serviceability, where building movements affect cladding or occupant comfort, based on ASCE/SEI 7-16 with the supporting information and additional rules the Code gives for Dubai.5 The Code’s reference wind speeds are used instead of the ASCE/SEI 7-16 wind maps, and the same clause sets a minimum design wind pressure that applies in all cases.5 The speeds, the minimum pressure and how the risk category selects the row are in the wind guide and are not repeated here.

SCI P399, a UK guide to portal frames designed to Eurocode 3, describes the behaviour. Under uplift the column moment reverses and the side rails then restrain the column’s compression flange,17 while in the rafter most of the bottom flange goes into compression, the purlins do not restrain it, and the rafter has to be verified between torsional restraints.18 This is UK Eurocode practice, cited for the behaviour only; it is not a Dubai design basis.

Practical consideration

A steel-sheeted roof weighs little, so the permanent load holding it down is small and uplift can reverse the forces everywhere: in the rafter, in the purlins and their cleats, in the eaves and apex connections, in the anchor rods and in the foundation’s resistance to lifting. Set up the uplift combinations from ASCE/SEI 7-16 Chapter 2 (not held here) with the lowest realistic permanent load, and treat the enclosure condition as a design decision: large roller-shutter doors that could be open in a storm change the internal pressure, which the wind guide lists as an input.

Frame stability in the plane of the frames

AISC 360 requires stability for the structure as a whole and for each element, with second-order effects, imperfections and stiffness reductions accounted for, and permits the direct analysis method for all structures,6 with the effective length and first-order methods of Appendix 7 as alternatives within that appendix’s limits.19 The stability guide, Load paths, stability and bracing of steel structures in Dubai, sets out those requirements, notional loads and stiffness reductions in full; this section keeps to what is particular to portal frames.

One of the conditions under which AISC 360 lets P-δ be left out of the structure’s overall response is that no more than one-third of the total gravity load is carried by columns that are part of moment-resisting frames in the direction being considered.19

Practical consideration

In the plane of a portal frame practically every column is part of a moment frame, so that condition fails and the analysis has to capture P-δ as well as P-Δ, for example by dividing each rafter and column into several elements in the software (our reading).

SCI P399 explains why the two directions are treated differently. A portal frame building is a series of unbraced transverse frames, braced longitudinally; in the plane of each frame the rigid eaves and apex joints resist the loads, so in-plane stability is considered for the frame as a whole.2021 Out of plane, the longitudinal bracing and secondary steelwork provide points of lateral restraint that set the lengths over which the columns and rafters can buckle, so their out-of-plane stability can be considered member by member.21 This is UK Eurocode practice, cited for behaviour, not as a design basis.

Under the direct analysis method, members are then checked to Chapters D to K with no further check of overall stability, taking the unbraced length as the effective length for flexural buckling unless rational analysis justifies less, and any bracing that defines those lengths needs enough stiffness and strength to control movement at the braced points.7 The effective length method works differently: the effective length is KL, and in moment frames, where the columns’ bending stiffness provides lateral stability as a portal’s columns do in the plane of the frame, K or the elastic buckling stress of those columns comes from a sidesway buckling analysis of the structure. K = 1.0 may be used for all columns only where the ratio of maximum second-order to maximum first-order drift, both for LRFD or 1.6 × ASD combinations, is 1.1 or less in every storey.22 The method itself is limited to structures carrying gravity mainly through nominally vertical elements and with that drift ratio, on the same basis and with unreduced stiffness, of 1.5 or less in every storey.23

Practical consideration

So a portal column checked by the effective length method with K = 1.0 in the plane of the frame is not justified unless the drift ratio has been shown to be 1.1 or less. Choose the method, record it and its drift ratio in the basis of design, and see the stability guide for how the methods compare.

Restraint of rafters and columns out of plane

The Code requires every feature with a critical influence on overall stability to be identified and included in the design, including all members that restrain critical members in compression, and requires continuous load paths from where each action is applied to the ground.8

Appendix 6 of AISC 360 sets the minimum strength and stiffness of the braces that define unbraced lengths, and a bracing system that braces several members is designed for the sum of their required strengths, with the stiffness of its connections and anchorage included.24 The stability guide sets out its equations; three of its points bear directly on portal frames.

First, a user note on column bracing says lateral bracing is assumed to act at the shear centre: bracing that does not prevent twist leaves the column open to torsional buckling, and bracing offset from the shear centre to constrained-axis torsional buckling.25 Side rails fixed to a column’s outer flange are offset bracing of that kind (our reading).

Second, a braced point between supports has to prevent twist, and in double-curvature bending the inflection point is not a braced point unless bracing is provided there.26 Lateral bracing is attached at or near the compression flange, with two exceptions: at the free end of a cantilever it goes at or near the top, tension, flange, and at the brace nearest the inflection point of a beam in double curvature it goes at or near both flanges.26 Torsional bracing may be attached anywhere on the section.27

Third, Section 6.3 is written for I-shaped members with zero net axial force; for a beam-column such as a rafter, Section 6.4 adds the axial and flexural requirements together, and where axial force and bending put both flanges in compression, both flanges have to be restrained.262829

Practical consideration

A portal rafter under gravity is in double curvature, hogging near the eaves and sagging towards the apex, so the brace point nearest each inflection point needs bracing at both flanges: in the usual arrangement the purlin braces the top flange and a stay the bottom flange there, and both are checked (our reading of Section 6.3.1(b)). An eaves canopy that cantilevers from the frame needs its lateral brace at or near the top flange at the free end.

SCI P399 gives the portal-frame picture in UK practice. Under gravity load the rafter hogs near the eaves, with its bottom flange in compression, and sags near the apex.17 The side rails are fixed to the outer flange of the column, so the inner compression flange is unrestrained unless restraints are added, and a side rail interrupted by industrial doors cannot be relied on for torsional restraint.30 The guide recommends a torsional restraint at the underside of the haunch and warns that a separate member restraining the inner flanges must be tied to the outer flange or to the foundation, because the aim is to stop the section twisting, not merely to connect the inner flanges together.31 Restraint to inner flanges is commonly made with diagonal stays from purlins or sheeting rails; where it can come from one side only, the stay has to be able to carry compression; and its effectiveness depends on the stiffness of the system, especially of the purlins.32 This is UK Eurocode practice, cited for principle only.

Practical consideration

One difference matters on a Dubai project designed to AISC 360. P399 records that UK practice treats the point of contraflexure in a rafter as a restraint when stated conditions are met,33 whereas AISC 360-16 does not count an inflection point as a braced point unless bracing is actually provided there.26 Provide the brace or do not count the point. For the same reason, size stays and purlin restraints to Appendix 6, as in the worked example below, not to UK rules of thumb.

StepValueBasis
ArrangementRafter near the eaves in hogging, bottom (inner) flange in compression; a purlin with a diagonal stay to the bottom flange acts as a point brace at the compression flangeAssumed; App. 6.3.1 places lateral bracing at the compression flange
Required strengths, LRFDRafter axial compression Pr = 60 kN; largest moment in the adjacent unbraced lengths Mr = 250 kNmAssumed; from the frame analysis in a real design
GeometryDistance between flange centroids ho = 550 mm; actual stay spacing Lbr = 1500 mmAssumed; App. 6.4(b) uses the actual unbraced length
Strength, axial part0.01 × 60 = 0.60 kNEq. A-6-3
Strength, flexural part (Cd = 1.0)0.02 × 250 000 × 1.0 / 550 = 9.09 kNEq. A-6-7
Required brace strength0.60 + 9.09 = 9.69 kNApp. 6.4(b): the two parts are added
Stiffness, axial part8 × 60 / 1500 = 0.320 kN/mm; divided by 0.75 gives 0.427 kN/mmEq. A-6-4a
Stiffness, flexural part10 × 250 000 × 1.0 / (1500 × 550) = 3.030 kN/mm; divided by 0.75 gives 4.040 kN/mmEq. A-6-8a
Required brace stiffness0.427 + 4.040 = 4.47 kN/mmApp. 6.4(b)
Brace point nearest the inflection point (Cd = 2.0)Bracing needed at both flanges, the purlin at the top flange and the stay at the bottom flange; each checked for 0.60 + 18.18 = 18.78 kN and 8.51 kN/mmEq. A-6-7 and A-6-8a with Cd = 2.0; App. 6.3.1(b); checking both is our reading
Purlin line restraining six such raftersStrength 6 × 9.69 = 58.1 kN and stiffness 6 × 4.47 = 26.8 kN/mm, to be carried into the roof bracingApp. 6.1: based on the sum of the members braced; our arithmetic
Worked example: required strength and stiffness of a rafter stay near the eaves, AISC 360-16 Appendix 6.4 (our calculation)

Inputs are assumed for illustration; LRFD with φ = 0.75 for both parts.3427 Section 6.4(b) adds the column and beam requirements and uses the actual unbraced length,29 and Section 6.3.1(b) requires bracing at or near both flanges at the brace nearest an inflection point.26 The stiffness supplied by the stay, its bolts and the purlin together, including connection and anchorage flexibility, has to reach the required value unless analysis shows smaller values are justified, and one system bracing several members is designed for their sum.24 Treating the stay as a lateral brace at the compression flange is our modelling choice; if it is designed as a torsional brace instead, Section 6.3.2 applies to the flexural part, the axial part still needs point or panel bracing, Section 6.4(c) has the two combined or distributed consistently with the actual bracing details, and a user note warns that torsional bracing is ineffective when the web’s distortional stiffness is too low.28 Arithmetic checked by an independent recalculation. Illustration only.

Practical consideration

Show every restraint the design relies on as a structural member on the drawings: fly braces with their bolts and hole type, the purlin and rail sizes and laps assumed, the eaves strut, and extra restraint where doors or openings interrupt the side rails. Bolts in oversized or slotted holes can slip before they bear, which cuts the stiffness a stay provides (our observation).

Built-up and tapered members

Steel plate for built-up sections has to be at least 6 mm thick.9

Practical consideration

Pre-engineered portal frames are usually welded, web-tapered I-sections with thin webs, so check every web and flange plate against the 6 mm minimum, specify the plate grade actually supplied, and design the flange-to-web welds. Our search of this library’s AISC 360-16 page notes found no provisions written specifically for web-tapered members. P399 gives interaction checks for tapered segments, taken from BS 5950 because, it says, BS EN 1993-1-1 is silent on them;35 they are UK practice, not a Dubai design basis. State in the basis of design how tapered segments are checked for lateral-torsional buckling, and agree the method with the reviewer.

Eaves, apex and splice connections

Bolted connections are designed and constructed to the AISC Steel Construction Manual, including the specification for structural joints using ASTM A325 or A490 bolts.36 Welding follows AWS D1.1 or BS EN ISO 15614; welding should not be done on site, and where it cannot be avoided the method of work, certificates and tests are submitted for approval.36 No connection may be detailed to rely on welds and bolts together.36

P399 notes, as UK practice, that deep portal members with relatively thin webs usually need a compression stiffener in the column at the eaves, that the column web panel and the column flange in the tension zone may need strengthening, and that a significant reversed moment under uplift may need a stiffener at the top of the column in line with the rafter’s top flange.37 Cited for principle only.

Practical consideration

Together these rules push portal frames towards shop-welded members with bolted end-plate joints at the eaves, the apex and any rafter splice. Those joints carry moment in both senses, gravity one way and uplift the other, so check bolts, end plates, stiffeners and the column flange and web for both.

Serviceability, cladding and doors

Deflection limits have to meet the referenced design standards and the project-specific requirements set by features such as the cladding, crane girders and members supporting sensitive machinery.10 For steelwork the Code says the limits conform to AISC 360 and AISC Design Guide 3, which this library does not hold; a cantilever may be taken as a span of twice its length, and the limits do not account for precamber.11 Overall wind displacement and inter-storey drift, calculated with 10-year return wind pressures, are checked against Table F.11; the Code says the overall displacement limit protects cladding, partitions and other non-structural components.38 The serviceability guide covers these clauses and how the drift limits read for a single-storey shed.

SCI P399 notes, as UK practice, that the acceptable deflections of a portal frame depend on its appearance, use and cladding type and should be agreed with the client; that differential deflection between adjacent frames has to be limited so the sheeting fixings are not overstrained, tearing the sheeting and causing leaks; that steel sheeting stiffens the frame as a stressed skin, so the bare-frame deflection overstates the real one; and that a sheeted or braced gable is very stiff in its own plane, so the calculated differential deflection between the gable and the first internal frame can be large.39

Practical consideration

Write the portal-frame limits into the basis of design, with their source: eaves sway under 10-year wind, rafter deflection, differential movement between the gable and the first frame, and the movement the door, dock-leveller and cladding suppliers can accept. Do not count on the stressed-skin effect unless the sheeting and its fixings are designed for it. AISC 360 requires every roof system to be investigated for ponding unless its surface is configured to prevent water accumulating,40 which the serviceability guide covers.

Thermal movement of long sheds

For steel members and members exposed to the sun, the Code takes the thermal range as the maximum temperature swing, allows a default of ±25 °C for protected steel, and requires the Engineer to assess the thermal range and the thermally induced forces case by case, considering the construction stages, exposure and when the steel structure is locked into its final configuration.12 AISC 360 also requires the effects of thermal expansion and contraction of a building to be considered.41 The loads guide covers these clauses and the Code’s self-straining rules.

P399 gives expansion-joint spacings for steel-framed industrial buildings on the stated basis that temperature movements in the UK are generally small.42 The Dubai Code instead sets a default range of ±25 °C for protected steel and case-by-case ranges for exposed steelwork,12 so those spacings are not transferred here. The same guide observes that satisfactory expansion joints are neither easy nor cheap, that it is usually better to detail the structure so joints are avoided, for example by resisting expansion with braced bays, and that care should be taken to detail any joints provided so that differential movement cannot cause cladding leaks.43 It lists the positions wall bracing may take: at one or both ends of the building, within its length, or in each portion between expansion joints.44

Practical consideration

On a long Dubai shed, decide first whether the frame is protected steel inside an insulated envelope or exposed steelwork, then calculate the free movement of the eaves struts, purlin runs and any crane rails over the length between restraints, using the thermal coefficient of the specified steel (not stated in this library). Two braced bays at opposite ends of a long building lock the steel between them; a braced bay near the middle, or one in each length between movement joints, lets the rest move. State the lock-in temperature and the slotted connections on the drawings.

Column bases, anchor rods and post-installed anchors

Table F.5 lists anchor rods to ASTM F1554 at 380 N/mm², with a second figure of 517 printed as the yield strength where a supplementary weldability requirement applies;9 the reading the Authority applies to those figures has not been confirmed, so confirm the anchor-rod grade and yield value for the project. AISC 360 approves several anchor-rod specifications and notes that ASTM F1554 is the preferred one.45

AISC 360 requires anchor rods to provide the required resistance at column bases, including the net tension from any bending moment, designed as threaded parts, with the transfer of force into the concrete to ACI 318 or ACI 349.46 Where anchor rods resist horizontal force, the hole size, the anchor-rod setting tolerance and the horizontal movement of the column have to be considered, and larger oversized or slotted base-plate holes are permitted with ASTM F844 washers or plate washers bridging the hole.46 A user note points to AISC Design Guide 1 for column base design,46 which this library does not hold.

Post-installed anchors into reinforced concrete may support steelwork where cast-in anchors are impractical.36 They are designed to ACI 318-19 for every conceivable failure mechanism, which Figure F.14, adapted from ACI 318-19, illustrates as steel, pullout, concrete and bond failures under tension and steel, pryout and concrete failures under shear.36

P399 records UK practice for bases: most portal bases are nominally pinned, because a rigid base makes the foundation resist moment and costs significantly more,37 but they should be designed for the small moment from wind on a free-standing column during erection so that temporary bracing is not needed, and where crane girders are carried by the column, moment-resisting bases may be needed to limit deflections.47 Cited for principle only.

Practical consideration

For a light shed the base is usually governed by uplift and shear rather than compression: the anchor rods take the net tension, and the foundation needs enough weight or ground resistance not to lift. Check breakout of each anchor group near slab and pedestal edges, take base shear through the rods only after allowing for hole clearance and setting tolerance, or provide a shear key, and show the F1554 grade and any weldability supplement on the drawings. The Code asks the Engineer to state the construction-stage load assumptions on the drawings and verify the structure for them,48 which for a portal frame includes free-standing columns and part-erected bays before the bracing is in.

Building permit and inspections with Dubai Municipality

Dubai Municipality’s procedure for industrial buildings has three online steps through the Dubai BPS system, each shown as the responsibility of the consultant and the contractor.13 First, the building permit: the applicant attaches all required drawings and documents, fills in the building card information and pays the permit fees; the government authorities taking part review the application through the unified window and upload their NOCs, and the Municipality issues the permit and stamps the drawings, which can then be printed online.13 For this step the sheet cites Circular (224) of 2018.13

Second, structural inspection, requested for shoring works and foundations and for cast concrete slabs or steel structures; a note says inspection of steel structures is done for heights larger than G+1.13 The Building Control Department inspects, and foundations are inspected by a unified committee of the Building Control and Survey Departments.13 Third, the final inspection for completion and services connection: the consultant and contractor notify the Municipality that the work is finished, a joint team of the authorities concerned (Building Control, Survey, Dubai Civil Defence, RTA, etisalat and du) inspects, after which the completion certificate is issued and the connections are made.13

Practical consideration

Three cautions. The sheet is a Dubai Municipality procedure, marked version 4 and dated 10/5/2020, which could mean 10 May or 5 October 2020, and it was not checked against the current Dubai BPS portal; projects in free zones and other licensing areas follow their own authority, which the guide Which building code applies to a steel project in Dubai, including free zones explains. As printed, the steel-structure inspection note ties inspection to heights above G+1 and does not say how a single-storey high-bay shed is treated, so confirm the inspection stages with the Municipality at permit stage. Circular (224) of 2018 is not held by this library.

Portal-frame warehouse: items to settle before issuing drawings

  • Scope confirmed: warehouse or factory use under Part F; racks, cranes and forklifts treated as loads and impacts on the building
  • Codes and editions, design life, risk category and site class written into the basis of design
  • Wind cases include net uplift with the lowest realistic permanent load and the chosen enclosure condition
  • Stability method chosen and recorded; second-order analysis including P-δ; K for portal columns from a sidesway buckling analysis if the effective length method is used
  • Every restraint relied on (purlins, rails, stays, eaves struts) designed as a brace and shown on the drawings
  • Both flanges braced at the brace point nearest each inflection point; inflection points not otherwise counted as braced
  • Built-up and tapered plates at least 6 mm thick, with the plate grade and the tapered-member check method stated
  • Eaves, apex and splice joints checked for moment in both senses, bolted rather than site-welded
  • Deflection limits for sway, rafters, gables, doors and cladding stated with their source
  • Thermal range, lock-in temperature, bracing position and slotted connections decided for the building length
  • Anchor rods checked for uplift, shear, hole clearance and concrete breakout; foundation checked for uplift
  • Construction-stage assumptions on the drawings; permit and inspection stages confirmed with the licensing authority

A working list for a junior engineer. It is not an approval checklist.

Scope and limits

Practical consideration

Values are from the 2021 edition of the Dubai Building Code and from ANSI/AISC 360-16 as read on the check date; later amendments and editions were not audited. ASCE/SEI 7-16, AISC 341, AISC Design Guides 1 and 3, ASTM F1554, ACI 318-19 and Dubai Municipality Circular (224) of 2018 are named but not held by this library, so their contents are not stated. SCI P399 is UK Eurocode guidance, cited for portal-frame behaviour and restraint principles only; none of its values is used, and a small typing error on one cited page does not affect its meaning. The worked example is our arithmetic, not a design of any frame. This guide is not a design, and approval of a design rests with the Authority.

Questions this guide answers

Source notes

Numbered notes point to the exact section and physical PDF page. Page numbers are the PDF viewer’s page, which can differ from the number printed on the page. Sources checked 25 September 2026. These notes support the statements; they are not a substitute for reading the current document for a project.

  1. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part A, A.5.1 General, Table A.1 and Table A.2 Occupancies and use types (printed page A9), PDF page 11. Open the publisher PDF at page 11 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  2. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part A, A.5.1 General, continuation: structures to which the DBC does not apply (printed page A10), PDF page 12. Open the publisher PDF at page 12 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  3. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.6.5.1 Design basis for structural steel, right-hand column (printed page F29), PDF page 355. Open the publisher PDF at page 355 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  4. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.1 General and F.7.2 Load combinations (printed page F33), PDF page 359. Open the publisher PDF at page 359 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  5. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.12.1 Design basis and F.7.12.2 Wind pressures (printed page F37), PDF page 363. Open the publisher PDF at page 363 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  6. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Chapter C, C1 General stability requirements and C1.1 Direct analysis method of design, printed page 16.1-22. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  7. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Chapter C, C3 Calculation of available strengths (direct analysis method), with user note, printed page 16.1-27. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  8. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.5.4 Structural stability (printed page F13), PDF page 339. Open the publisher PDF at page 339 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  9. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, Table F.5 Steel grades based on American specifications and F.6.5.3 Plate thickness (printed page F30), PDF page 356. Open the publisher PDF at page 356 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  10. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.1 Design basis and F.8.3.1 Deflection control, general (printed page F44), PDF page 370. Open the publisher PDF at page 370 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  11. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.8.3.3 Steelwork deflection limits (printed page F45), PDF page 371. Open the publisher PDF at page 371 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  12. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.11 Thermally induced forces (printed page F35), PDF page 361. Open the publisher PDF at page 361 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  13. Industrial buildings: Building Permits Procedures, Publisher listing 26 October 2021; verify current portal. Dubai Municipality. Procedure of Issuing Building Permit and Building Completion Certificate from DM, 02 Industrial Buildings, version (4), Steps 1 to 3 (single page), PDF page 1. Open the publisher PDF at page 1 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩

  14. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.4.1 Application (printed page F11), PDF page 337. Open the publisher PDF at page 337 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  15. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.5 Live loads, item a (printed page F34), PDF page 360. Open the publisher PDF at page 360 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  16. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.8 Accidental impact load (printed page F35), PDF page 361. Open the publisher PDF at page 361 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  17. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Sections 8.3.2 Out-of-plane stability under uplift combinations and 8.4 Rafter stability and 8.4.1 Out-of-plane stability under gravity loading (printed page 72), PDF page 84. Open the publisher PDF at page 84 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  18. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 8.4.2 Rafter and haunch stability under uplift conditions (printed page 76), PDF page 88. Open the publisher PDF at page 88 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  19. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Chapter C, C1.2 Alternative methods of design and C2.1 General analysis requirements (b), printed page 16.1-23. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  20. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 2.1 General (printed page 5), PDF page 17. Open the publisher PDF at page 17 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  21. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 2.1 General, continued (printed page 6), PDF page 18. Open the publisher PDF at page 18 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  22. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 7, 7.2.3 Available strengths (a) and (b), with exception, printed page 16.1-246. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  23. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 7, 7.1 General stability requirements and 7.2.1 Limitations of the effective length method, printed page 16.1-245. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  24. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 6 Member stability bracing, introduction, user note and 6.1 General provisions, printed page 16.1-237. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  25. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 6, 6.1 (continued) and 6.2 Column bracing, with user note, printed page 16.1-238. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  26. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 6, 6.3 Beam bracing and 6.3.1 Lateral bracing, (a) and (b), printed page 16.1-240. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩

  27. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 6, 6.3.1b Point bracing, Eq. A-6-7 and A-6-8, and 6.3.2 Torsional bracing, printed page 16.1-241. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  28. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 6, 6.3.2 user notes, 6.3.2b Continuous bracing and 6.4 Beam-column bracing (a), printed page 16.1-243. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  29. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 6, 6.4 Beam-column bracing (b) to (d), printed page 16.1-244. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  30. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 8.3.1 Column stability under gravity loading, continued (printed page 71), PDF page 83. Open the publisher PDF at page 83 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  31. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 8.3.1 Column stability under gravity loading (printed page 70), PDF page 82. Open the publisher PDF at page 82 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  32. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 9.3 Restraint to inner flanges (printed page 84), PDF page 96. Open the publisher PDF at page 96 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  33. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 8.4.1 Rafter stability in Zones B and C (printed page 75), PDF page 87. Open the publisher PDF at page 87 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  34. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Appendix 6, 6.2.1 (continued) and 6.2.2 Point bracing, Eq. A-6-3 and A-6-4, printed page 16.1-239. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  35. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 8.4.1, verification of tapered segments (printed page 74), PDF page 86. Open the publisher PDF at page 86 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  36. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.6.5.4 Structural connections: bolted, welded and post-installed anchors, with Figure F.14 (printed page F31), PDF page 357. Open the publisher PDF at page 357 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩

  37. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Sections 11.1 Eaves connections (continued), 11.2 Apex connections and 11.3 Bases (printed page 92), PDF page 104. Open the publisher PDF at page 104 (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩

  38. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.12.3.1 Requirements for testing, F.7.12.4.1 Allowable displacement and Table F.11 (printed page F38), PDF page 364. Open the publisher PDF at page 364 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  39. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 12.1 Deflections and 12.1.1 Deflection sensitive details (printed page 99), PDF page 111. Open the publisher PDF at page 111 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  40. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Section B3.10 Design for ponding, printed page 16.1-15. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  41. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Chapter L, L6 Thermal expansion and contraction, printed page 16.1-166. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  42. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 12.2 Thermal expansion (printed page 102), PDF page 114. Open the publisher PDF at page 114 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  43. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 12.2.1 Expansion joints (printed page 103), PDF page 115. Open the publisher PDF at page 115 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  44. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Chapter 9 Bracing, 9.1 Vertical bracing and 9.1.1 Bracing location (printed page 81), PDF page 93. Open the publisher PDF at page 93 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  45. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Section A3.4 Anchor rods and threaded rods, with user note, printed page 16.1-9. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩

  46. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), ANSI/AISC 360-16, July 7, 2016. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Section J9 Anchor rods and embedments, with user notes, printed page 16.1-141. Publisher page (opens in a new tab) ↩ ↩ ↩

  47. Design of Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (SCI P399), 2015; verified PDF front matter. Steel Construction Institute. SCI P399, Section 11.3 Bases, base plates and foundations, continued (printed page 93), PDF page 105. Open the publisher PDF at page 105 (opens in a new tab) ↩

  48. Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition. Government of Dubai; official copy hosted by Dubai Development Authority. Part F, F.7.7 Construction load (printed page F35), PDF page 361. Open the publisher PDF at page 361 (opens in a new tab) ↩